4 ms·
I think I misread the figures. But still, they have: > A source video frame from They Cloned Tyrone > Regular AV1 (without FGS) @ 8274 kbps > AV1 with FGS @
by bee_rider 1y ago
I think I misread the figures.
But still, they have:
> A source video frame from They Cloned Tyrone
> Regular AV1 (without FGS) @ 8274 kbps
> AV1 with FGS @ 2804 kbps
Just to emphasize the problem, would it be nice to see:
Regular AV1 (without FGS) @ 2804 kbps
It should look really bad, right? Which would emphasize their results.
- joemi 1y agoBut why do they need to emphasize it even more than the examples they gave? The "AV1 with FGS @ 2804 kbps" already looks as good or better than the "AV1 (without FGS) @ 8274 kbps", so it'll definitely look better than AV1 without FGS at an even lower bandwidth.