3 ms·
> It seems like a shame that they didn’t include a screenshot of the original (with natural grain), after suffering from low-bitrate streaming. Isn't that the
by joemi 1y ago
> It seems like a shame that they didn’t include a screenshot of the original (with natural grain), after suffering from low-bitrate streaming.
Isn't that the image captioned "Regular AV1 (without FGS) @ 8274 kbps"?
- bee_rider 1y agoI think I misread the figures. But still, they have: > A source video frame from They Cloned Tyrone > Regular AV1 (without FGS) @ 8274 kbps > AV1 with FGS @ 2804 kbps Just to emphasize the problem, would it be nice to see: Regular AV1 (without FGS) @ 2804 kbps It should look really bad, right? Which would emphasize their results.
- joemi 1y agoBut why do they need to emphasize it even more than the examples they gave? The "AV1 with FGS @ 2804 kbps" already looks as good or better than the "AV1 (without FGS) @ 8274 kbps", so it'll definitely look better than AV1 without FGS at an even lower bandwidth.
- zerocrates 1y agoI think the distinction here is, they provide the "regular" stream, and the FGS stream noting that it's much smaller yet looks similar. What they don't have is a lower-bandwidth "regular" one, what 2000-or-so kbps looks like without FGS.