If you were originally trying to point out that all copyright enforcement outside of the West is poor (I doubt it) then you really should have made that clear.

If you were originally trying to point out that all copyright enforcement outside of the West is poor (I doubt it) then you really should have made that clear. In China, the GPL brings no specific problems that rights-holders using other licences don't face. If someone is going to violate the law completely, it won't help if you've made them click through an EULA. I don't think this is really what anyone is talking about. Everyone has copyright problems in China, including Microsoft and Apple. A web search for "gpl hall of shame" brings up an FFMPEG page so out of date that they took it down and an extremely out of date Busybox page. It also brings up this: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/05/cisco-settles-fsf-gpl-lawsuit-appoints-compliance-officer/ http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/05/cisco-... Fact is, the GPL works great and has a great history of being enforceable with plenty of high profile cases.