> asking for explanations as the starting point instead of "I read all of your code and give feedback." That just won't be sustainable given the rate at which t

> asking for explanations as the starting point instead of "I read all of your code and give feedback." That just won't be sustainable given the rate at which text can now be output. I claim that this approach is sustainable. The idea behind the "I read all of your code and give feedback." methodology is that the writer really put a lot of deep effort into making sure that the code is of great quality - and then he is expecting feedback, which is often valuable. As long as you can with some effort find out by yourself how improvements could be done, don't bother asking for someone else's time/ The problem is thus that the writers of "vibe-generated code" hardly ever put such a deep effort into the code. Thus the code is simply not worth asking feedback for.