4 ms·
>But the military may turn on its commanders if forced into a guerilla war against Americans. You mean a counter-terrorism operation against "Unpatriotic terro
by rgblambda 1y ago
>But the military may turn on its commanders if forced into a guerilla war against Americans.
You mean a counter-terrorism operation against "Unpatriotic terrorists"?
>The point is to draw out and make more difficult the oppression
You can achieve that more effectively with a general strike, without alienating those who aren't willing to fire on their own countries military. Legally purchasable firearms would be more of a nuisance than a threat for a modern army.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> a counter-terrorism operation against "Unpatriotic terrorists"? Yes. The traditional framing is riot or rebellion suppression. > can achieve that more effectively with a general strike This is civil action. If protests and strikes work, the point is moot. Where weapons and training have historically made a difference is when the army is sent in to quell a strike.