3 ms·

Thanks! This live demo uses metadata and stats only. Right now we are testing ViTs and Foundation Models as well. But quality of results from EO FMs haven't bee

by sabman 1y ago

Thanks! This live demo uses metadata and stats only. Right now we are testing ViTs and Foundation Models as well. But quality of results from EO FMs haven't been worth the inference cost so far. Early days though. Also starting to fine tune models for specific downstream tasks ourselves.

fnands 1y ago
Cool, makes sense. Yeah, have you considered maybe looking into just running it on embeddings [1], instead of the imagery itself? Would save on most of the inference cost, at the cost of flexibility (i.e. you are locked into whatever embeddings have been created). [1] https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/GOOGLE_SATELLITE_EMBEDDING_V1_ANNUAL https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/...
- sabman 1y ago
  ah yes we have been testing other embedding models but not google's. I'll try this too. Its interesting most of them are doing land cover classes which is kinda solved already. We are also testing mixing agenic workflows with smaller directed prompts for users to provide the classes. Incidentally we are Berlin based. We should grab a coffee :)