4 ms·
That's not my point. My point is that the exact same code from the original article could be done in a single, traditional for-loop, instead of two for-each loo
by moron4hire 1y ago
That's not my point. My point is that the exact same code from the original article could be done in a single, traditional for-loop, instead of two for-each loops.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]