3 ms·
You’re conflating the US’s constitutional protections against government attacks on free speech with the broader concept of (the virtue of) free speech. No one
by wk_end 1y ago
You’re conflating the US’s constitutional protections against government attacks on free speech with the broader concept of (the virtue of) free speech. No one is saying that what Mozilla did was illegal.
Just curious: would you defend a company for firing someone for speaking out in support of gay marriage?
- const_cast 1y ago> Just curious: would you defend a company for firing someone for speaking out in support of gay marriage? Well companies already do this all the time - this is more so the status-quo. I'm not going to pretend the majority are somehow, in some roundabout way, oppressed. Is this person fired for supporting gay marriage, or being gay? Because obviously that's illegal... you can't fire someone for being part of a protected class. Being a republican or whatever is not a protected class, being gay is. One matters, one doesn't.