3 ms·
Has anywhere tried rent taxes to fund new construction? It'd need to be strictly tied with a viable building method, to limit NIMBY problems, but would accompl
by ethbr1 1y ago
Has anywhere tried rent taxes to fund new construction?
It'd need to be strictly tied with a viable building method, to limit NIMBY problems, but would accomplish the goal.
If rent for class Y housing is $A, and the target price is a lesser $B, then tax the $A-$B difference at a high rate, with 100% of the tax proceeds being used to directly fund new class Y housing creation.
Bigger delta = more funding for new construcion
- ta1243 1y agoIf there's demand, companies will fund new construction. The problem is that planning, zoning, nimby restrictions means you can't The invisible hand of the market certainly isn't all powerful, just like chickens aren't spherical and travel in a vaccuum, but when you stick it in a plaster cast as we do with housing, it becomes useless. If you tax rental, what about owners? They won't care, they don't pay the tax.
- ethbr1 1y ago> If there's demand, companies will fund new construction. Not necessarily. Companies will fund new construction that gives them the best returns. Because there are rarely luxury limits on what can be built on land, this results in the most square footage, luxurious house that the market will bear. > If you tax rental, what about owners? They won't care, they don't pay the tax. Owners would pay the tax in this scenario.