> Am I spending too much time on HN Likely (as am I). > LLMs are exciting but they produce messy code for which the dev feels no ownership. [...] The other si

> Am I spending too much time on HN Likely (as am I). > LLMs are exciting but they produce messy code for which the dev feels no ownership. [...] The other side of it is people who seem to have 'gotten it' and can dispatch multiple agents to plan/execute/merge changes across a project Yup, can confirm, there are indeed people with differing opinions and experience/anecdotes on HN. > want to tell you how awesome their workflow is without actually showing any code. You might be having some AI-news-fatigue (I can relate) and missed a few, but there are also people who seem to have gotten it and do want to show code: Armin Ronacher (of Flask, Jinja2, Sentry fame): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfOVgz_omlU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfOVgz_omlU (workflow) and https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2025/6/21/my-first-ai-library/ https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2025/6/21/my-first-ai-library/ (code) Here's one of my non-trivial open source projects where a large portion is AI built: https://github.com/senko/cijene-api https://github.com/senko/cijene-api (didn't keep stats, I'd eyeball it at conservatively 50% - 80%)