5 ms·
> It's like landing on Free Parking in Monopoly. I have no clue what you’re trying to convey with this analogy? “Free Parking” is different in virtually every
by apgwoz 1y ago
> It's like landing on Free Parking in Monopoly.
I have no clue what you’re trying to convey with this analogy? “Free Parking” is different in virtually every household.
- tptacek 1y agoI was not thinking about random house rules in the analogy.
- toast0 1y agoStandard rules free parking is a no-op; you get nothing and pay nothing. It just prolongs the inevitable.
- tptacek 1y agoYes, that's what I was referring to.
- apgwoz 1y agoBut then this analogy doesn’t hold… Has there ever been a startup in history where it’s break even everywhere? Investors don’t get their money back, customers (hopefully!) are made whole, and the founders and employees are now out of a job and _perhaps_ didn’t get their final pay check depending on how bad it is.
- tptacek 1y agoYeah, you're missing my point. Given most startups fail, the question isn't "at the end of the day do you still get a paycheck for your failed startup", it's "how much of your life did you burn on that failed startup". Since we're talking about a specific startup whose founders are participants here, I think we can do without the ghoulish stuff about them not making payroll or whatever; "winding down" implies they're failing in an orderly way.
- apgwoz 1y agoI got your point (after the Free Parking clarification). (To be clear, my comment wasn’t on Double specifically. No clue how strapped for cash they are while winding down. They seem to be doing right be people (paying fees and such), and that’s great.) Finally, maybe it’s unintentional, but you seem to be implying that “it’s not worth burning your life on a failed startup,” which seems like a bad take. If you spend 5 years on a startup that shows promise but ultimately doesn’t pan out, is that always worse than spending 6 months on a startup that fails fast? First, this would be wildly hard to prove, and second, there are obviously counter examples.
- tptacek 1y agoYes. If you spend 5 years on a promising startup that fails, that is strictly worse than spending 6 months on a promising startup that fails.
- apgwoz 1y agoLOL. Completely disagree. In that 5 years, I’ve identified a shit ton of stuff that works, doesn’t work, and made relationships along the way. I’d bet money on the founder of the 5 yr startup being successful over the 6 months founder.
- tptacek 1y agoYou do that stuff in every job. Meanwhile, people with careers in startups do multiple startups. You get a finite number of them. You are literally better off working at somebody else's successful startup than you are spending 5 years on a doomed startup. The most valuable asset you have is time.
- apgwoz 1y agoBoth of us are arguing based on feelings and intuition, so this is going no where. If you can cite a study then so be it. I think what we can both agree on is that it is pretty obvious that prior startup experience is key to the next startup being successful.