> LLM's kind of do their own thing, and the data you get back out of them is correct, incorrect, or dangerously incorrect (i.e. is plausible enough to be taken

> LLM's kind of do their own thing, and the data you get back out of them is correct, incorrect, or dangerously incorrect (i.e. is plausible enough to be taken as correct), with no algorithmic way to discern which is which. Exactly like information from humans, then?