3 ms·
To be fair, the question implies the port number of the local service is the problem, when it's more about making sure users can access it without needing to sp
by pimlottc 1y ago
To be fair, the question implies the port number of the local service is the problem, when it's more about making sure users can access it without needing to specify a port number in the URL.
Yes, an experienced person might be able to suss out what the real problem was, but it's not really the LLMs fault for answering the specific question it was asked. Maybe you just wanted to run a server for testing and didn't realize that you can add a non-standard port to the URL.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 1y agoIt's not really an LLM being "faulty" in that we kinda know they have these limitations. I think they're pointing out that these models have a hard time "thinking outside the box" which is generally a lauded skill, especially for the problem-solving/planning that agents are expected to do.
- causal 1y agoYeah LLMs are generally going to pursue a solution to the question, not figure out the need behind the ask. Not to mention the solution did end up being to use a higher port number...