I'm adding this tidbit of knowledge to my context as well... :-P Only recently have I started interacting with LLM's more (I tried out a previous "use it as a

I'm adding this tidbit of knowledge to my context as well... :-P Only recently have I started interacting with LLM's more (I tried out a previous "use it as a book club partner" suggestion, and it's pretty great!). When coding with them (via cursor), there was an interaction where I nudged it: "hey, you forgot xyz when you wrote that code the first time" (ie: updating an associated data structure or cache or whatever), and I find myself INTENTIONALLY giving the machine at least the shadow of a benefit of the doubt that: "Yeah, I might have made that mistake too if I were writing that code" or "Yeah, I might have written the base case first and _then_ gotten around to updating the cache, or decrementing the overall number of found items or whatever". In the "book club" and "movie club" case, I asked it to discuss two movies and there were a few flubs: was the main character "justly imprisoned", or "unjustly imprisoned" ... a human might have made that same typo? Correct it, don't dwell on it, go with the flow... even in a 100% human discussion on books and movies, people (and hallucinating AI/LLM's) can not remember with 100% pinpoint accuracy every little detail, and I find giving a bit of benefit of the doubt to the conversation partner lowers my stress level quite a bit. I guess: even when it's an AI, try to keep your interactions positive.