4 ms·
Thank you for the link. Was really interesting to read Behe's response to the critique.
by emil0r 14y ago
Thank you for the link. Was really interesting to read Behe's response to the critique.
- Lockyy 14y agoI agree that I was vague, however my response was not intended to be an absolute refutation of every argument that follows that pattern, otherwise I'd be playing whack-a-mole with arguments forever. It was meant to be a general explanation of how the argument makes a large assumption that would be pretty easy to refute with further research. As the person above did with a link. Also, I did give further reading with the selfish gene for a specific example of a bacteria's flagellum.