4 ms·
What an odd turn of phrase. Historically speaking, mercenaries have absolutely slaughtered missionaries in every confrontation. If missionaries could be mercen
by Festro 1y ago
What an odd turn of phrase. Historically speaking, mercenaries have absolutely slaughtered missionaries in every confrontation.
If missionaries could be mercenaries, they would.
- conartist6 1y agoYeah apparently being well fed and paid and extensive lly prepared helped? It's like these mercenaries were actually what you would call "professionals"
- antupis 1y agoThe term comes from John Doerr https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6iwEYmbCwk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6iwEYmbCwk . But Altman kicked most missionaries out during corporate turmoil in 2023, so not sure where this comes from.
- tim333 1y agoFrom that by the way >...one hand The Mercenaries they have enormous Drive they're opportunistic like Andy Grove they believe only the paranoids survive they're really sprinting for the short run but that's quite different I suggest to you than the missionaries who have passion not paranoia who are strategic not opportunistic and they're focused on the big idea in partnerships. It's the difference between focusing on the the competition or the customer. It's a difference between worshiping at the altar of Founders or having a meritocracy where you get all the ideas on the table and the best ones win it's a difference between being exclusively interested in the financial statements or also in the mission statements it's a difference between being a loner on your own or being part of a team having an attitude of entitlement versus contribution or uh as Randy puts it living a deferred Life Plan versus a whole life that at any given moment is trying to work difference between just making money anybody tells you they don't want to make money is lying or making money and making meaning Al also or my bottom line is it's the difference between success or success and significance.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- epolanski 1y agoAlso, OpenAI ain't missionaries, it's a for profit company full of people working there for a fat paycheck and equity.
- revskill 1y agoBoth are orthogonal concepts.
- thephyber 1y agoAnchoring the reader’s opinion by using the phrase “Missionaries” is pure marketing. Missionaries don’t get paid huge dollars or equity, they do it because it’s a religion / a calling. Ultimately why someone chooses to work at OpenAI or Meta or elsewhere boils down to a few key reasons. The mission aligns with their values. The money matches their expectations. The team has a chance at success. The orthogonality is irrelevant because nobody working for OpenAI or Meta is a missionary.
- megablast 1y agoExcept we have a lot more missionaries than mercenaries now. Right? So who won?
- a_c 1y agoMissionary as founder, mercenary as employee, everyone happy
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- avidphantasm 1y agoAnd both missionaries and mercenaries are responsible for the abuse and obliteration of many millions. Neither are forces for good.
- conartist6 1y agoThe force has a light side and a dark side. Apparently Switzerland is so famously neutral because their national export was mercenaries. You can't take sides in wars of you want to sell soldiers to both sides... But also I imagine that it helps when you wish to stay neutral if people are afraid of what you could do if you were directly involved in a conflict.
- nashashmi 1y agoMercenaries get paid to follow orders and kill. Missionaries are more independent. That is the sell point to the OpenAI worker.
- sksrbWgbfK 1y agoThe Knights Templar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar) were kinda both, but modern AI is more mercenary in order to grab all the profits and become a monopoly nowadays.