3 ms·

> but they clearly do actually take measures. Some times, but clearly not often enough. Does a refusal get more active than a message that says “Our review te

> but they clearly do actually take measures. Some times, but clearly not often enough. Does a refusal get more active than a message that says “Our review team has found that [the account’s] post does not go against our Community Guidelines”? > Then you report something real and it gets lost in an sea of fake reports. It didn’t get ‘lost’ — they (or their contract content moderators at Concentrix in the Phillipines) sat on it, and then sent a message that said they had decided to not do anything about it. > What are they supposed to do about that? They’ve either looked at the content and decided to do nothing about it, or they’ve lied when they said that they had, and that it didn’t breach policy. Which do you suppose it was?

AnthonyMouse 1y ago
> Does a refusal get more active than a message that says “Our review team has found that [the account’s] post does not go against our Community Guidelines”? That's assuming their "review team" actually reviewed it before sending that message and purposely chose to allow it to stay up knowing that it was a false negative. But that seems pretty unlikely compared to the alternative where the reviewers were overwhelmed and making determinations without doing a real review, or doing one so cursory the error was done blind. > They’ve either looked at the content and decided to do nothing about it, or they’ve lied when they said that they had, and that it didn’t breach policy. Which do you suppose it was? Almost certainly the second one. What would even be their motive to do the first one? Pedos are a blight that can't possibly be generating enough ad revenue through normal usage to make up for all the trouble they are, even under the assumption that the company has no moral compass whatsoever.

3 ms·

> but they clearly do actually take measures. Some times, but clearly not often enough. Does a refusal get more active than a message that says “Our review te

by bigfatkitten 1y ago

AnthonyMouse 1y ago
> Does a refusal get more active than a message that says “Our review team has found that [the account’s] post does not go against our Community Guidelines”? That's assuming their "review team" actually reviewed it before sending that message and purposely chose to allow it to stay up knowing that it was a false negative. But that seems pretty unlikely compared to the alternative where the reviewers were overwhelmed and making determinations without doing a real review, or doing one so cursory the error was done blind. > They’ve either looked at the content and decided to do nothing about it, or they’ve lied when they said that they had, and that it didn’t breach policy. Which do you suppose it was? Almost certainly the second one. What would even be their motive to do the first one? Pedos are a blight that can't possibly be generating enough ad revenue through normal usage to make up for all the trouble they are, even under the assumption that the company has no moral compass whatsoever.