3 ms·
Good share, thanks. My approach so far has been to define macros that generate the container type for a given underlying type, as well as all of the relevant ty
by canyp 1y ago
Good share, thanks. My approach so far has been to define macros that generate the container type for a given underlying type, as well as all of the relevant type-safe functions, which end up calling into functions that take void*. But the union trick plus the structural identity does seem to simplify things a bit.