3 ms·
The GPL has an excellent enforcement history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Software_Foundation#GPL_enforcement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Software_
by calpaterson 14y ago
The GPL has an excellent enforcement history.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Software_Foundation#GPL_enforcement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Software_Foundation#GPL_en...
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/enforcing-gpl.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/enforcing-gpl.html
- verroq 14y agoLets be realistic here, enforcement of copyright across nation boundaries is still difficult. Just look at the recent case where someone's game engine was cloned, translated and sold in China. Aside from some high profile targets, you cannot claim that GPL has an excellent enforcement history. A simple google query "gpl hall of shame" should suffice.
- calpaterson 14y agoIf you were originally trying to point out that all copyright enforcement outside of the West is poor (I doubt it) then you really should have made that clear. In China, the GPL brings no specific problems that rights-holders using other licences don't face. If someone is going to violate the law completely, it won't help if you've made them click through an EULA. I don't think this is really what anyone is talking about. Everyone has copyright problems in China, including Microsoft and Apple. A web search for "gpl hall of shame" brings up an FFMPEG page so out of date that they took it down and an extremely out of date Busybox page. It also brings up this: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/05/cisco-settles-fsf-gpl-lawsuit-appoints-compliance-officer/ http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/05/cisco-... Fact is, the GPL works great and has a great history of being enforceable with plenty of high profile cases.