1. You're misusing the term ad hominem: >The mere presence of a personal attack does not indicate ad hominem: the attack must be used for the purpose of underm

1. You're misusing the term ad hominem: >The mere presence of a personal attack does not indicate ad hominem: the attack must be used for the purpose of undermining the argument (http://plover.net/~bonds/adhominem.html http://plover.net/~bonds/adhominem.html) 2. I'm not going to respond to (or even read) any of your points about nutrition because you seem to be arguing with someone else, not me! I have no horse in this race, because I've never looked into it. I think you and gxs rather misunderstood Homonculiheaded's words -- which were about the general way folk were arguing, and not really about specific points at all.