3 ms·
That didn't work for the American colonies, Portugal and Spain were very focused on being missionaries and were beaten by the Dutch and Brits that just wanted t
by mlinhares 1y ago
That didn't work for the American colonies, Portugal and Spain were very focused on being missionaries and were beaten by the Dutch and Brits that just wanted to make money.
- hollerith 1y agoThe motive for settling the colonies in New England was emphatically not to make money.
- echelon_musk 1y agoHow about the Caribbean?
- bilbo0s 1y agoName the Caribbean nations that were the "winners"?
- echelon_musk 1y agoYou've missed my point entirely.
- MangoToupe 1y agoThat really depends on the time period. The puritanical core of the Massachusetts Bay Colony was certainly replaced by commercial/trade interests long before their war with the crown.
- dragonwriter 1y agoThe idea that the Spanish and Portuguese colonial effort wasn't droven by economic gain above all else is also beyond silly.
- elros 1y agoI believe Portuguese got there looking for a shorter route to India (money) and eventually settled the land for gold, silver, brazilwood, diamonds and sugarcane (money).
- mlinhares 1y agoNah, they very much wanted to do missionary work and find Preston John, they invested in a lot of shitty missions for absolutely no reason other than to try to convert people to the church. Conquerors is a great read on the subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquerors:_How_Portugal_Forged_the_First_Global_Empire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquerors:_How_Portugal_Forge... And don't get me wrong, they were very successful at filling their pockets with gold, but could have been even more if they were mostly mercenaries like the brits and the dutch.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 0xbadcafebee 1y ago90% of the reason Spain and Portugal explored the new world was for wealth (spices, gold/silver, sugar, brazilwood). The rest of the reason was to spread their religion and increase their national power. Missions only popped up 30 years after they first began colonization. The Dutch, British, and French were initially brought to the new world because they'd heard how rich it was and wanted a piece of the pie. It took them a while to establish a hold because the Spanish defended it so well (incumbents usually win) and also they kept settling frozen wastelands rather than tropical islands. The religiously persecuted groups (who were in no way state-sponsored) came 120 years after Spain's first forays.
- MangoToupe 1y agoIt's also worth noting that missions were often a chit to curry political favor with the catholic church. This was sort of the manufactured consent of the 17th century. There's also this illuminating letter sent from King Leopold II to missionaries in the late 19th century: https://www.fafich.ufmg.br/~luarnaut/Letter%20Leopold%20II%20to%20Colonial%20Missionaries.pdf https://www.fafich.ufmg.br/~luarnaut/Letter%20Leopold%20II%2... I would quote it, but it's worth reading in its entirety and is extremely blunt in its intent.
- HWR_14 1y agoIn what way did the Spanish lose out to the Dutch or the Brits? Did you only think of North America and forget everything south of the rio grande (and a good deal north of it)?