> It’s not crazy to argue that all the underlying mechanisms of these breakthroughs existed in the 1990s, if not before. That's not super relevant in my mind.

> It’s not crazy to argue that all the underlying mechanisms of these breakthroughs existed in the 1990s, if not before. That's not super relevant in my mind. It's because they're showing fruit now that will allow research to move forward. And the success, as we know, draws a lot of eyeballs, dollars, resources. If this path was going to hit a wall, we will hit it more quickly now. If another way is required to move forward, we are more likely to find it now.