Good questions! You're right the 200 test runs limit is too low. I badly want to increase this, but currently each test costs $.05 to run so I need to get the c

Good questions! You're right the 200 test runs limit is too low. I badly want to increase this, but currently each test costs $.05 to run so I need to get the costs down to enable that. But my next update will fix that – and also answer your second question. What I've realized is we don't actually need to use the AI on every test run. We just need to use the AI on the initial run, then subsequent tests can just replay the playwright steps the AI chose. And if a test fails, before throwing a failure we can re-run it with the AI assistance to see if the test truly failed from a user perspective. Hopefully when I add this functionality it can address your concerns around unpredictability :)