7 ms·

Religion ? Nice. Actually the FACT is that a company is required to defend their trademark as a condition of it being granted. Also a cease and desist isn't a

• cageface 14y ago
  Clearly you can't be too small for Apple to consider "bothering" with you. And if this all really about values and not money, as Tim Cook claims, why should it make any difference how big you are?
• jellicle 14y ago
  >Actually the FACT is that a company is required to defend their trademark as a condition of it being granted. Nope.
  • freehunter 14y ago
    Great rebuttal. I think I missed your sources though.
• esolyt 14y ago
  Apparently there is also another FACT. It is the fact that Apple bothers with you even if you are a small company. You claimed that the idea of this happening is ridiculous. Yet, they just showed you an example of this happening. I'm having a hard time trying to understand your argument now. Are you claiming the example is invalid or have you changed your argument and now claiming that Apple does that but it is okay for Apple to do that?
  • ahlatimer 14y ago
    If you infringe on Apple's trademark, big or small, you're likely to draw their ire. If you infringe on Apple's patents and you're a small player, you're probably not going to. Why? Trademarks have to be defended or they can be lost (not 100% accurate, but close enough). You can't say "I'll only sue companies who are bigger than x" when it comes to trademarks and still hold onto them. That isn't the case for patents. You can selectively sue (or not sue at all) and the patents remain valid.