4 ms·
It's closer to the second one. The implementation. It's just that in some cases it can be difficult nee impossible to implement it any other way. I would recom
by taligent 14y ago
It's closer to the second one. The implementation. It's just that in some cases it can be difficult nee impossible to implement it any other way.
I would recommend reading some patents. Most are far more specific than you realise.
- ajross 14y agoThe text of the patents is specific. The fact that you see judgements like this implies that the interpretation (at least by this jury) is as broad as it seems to be. No where in that verdict do I see a narrow, careful reading of the technicalities of multitouch UIs. They got asked questions of the form "Did this device infringe?" and answered "Yup", almost without exception. Where exactly is the subtlety you're talking about?