3 ms·
One interesting point is that any constitutionalist strict enough to claim that the oath must be taken verbatim would pretty much be claiming nullification of e
by aston 18y ago
One interesting point is that any constitutionalist strict enough to claim that the oath must be taken verbatim would pretty much be claiming nullification of every presidency. The oath as written doesn't include an allowance for the insertion of the President-to-be's name. It also doesn't include "So help me God," though since that falls after the oath it probably matters less.