3 ms·
If we zoom out far enough, and start to put more and more under the execution umbrella of AI, what we're actually describing here is... product development. Yo
by mgdev 1y ago
If we zoom out far enough, and start to put more and more under the execution umbrella of AI, what we're actually describing here is... product development.
You are constructing the set of context, policies, directed attention toward some intentional end, same as it ever was. The difference is you need fewer meat bags to do it, even as your projects get larger and larger.
To me this is wholly encouraging.
Some projects will remain outside what models are capable of, and your role as a human will be to stitch many smaller projects together into the whole. As models grow more capable, that stitching will still happen - just as larger levels.
But as long as humans have imagination, there will always be a role for the human in the process: as the orchestrator of will, and ultimate fitness function for his own creations.
- somewhereoutth 1y ago> for his own creations. for their own creations is grammatically valid, and would avoid accusations of sexism!
- briangriffinfan 1y agoAfter mulling this issue over in my head for a significant amount of time, I've determined that I don't care and he sounds more natural.
- GuinansEyebrows 1y agoi just hope that, along with imagination, humans can have an economy that supports this shift.
- pyman 1y agoThat does sound a lot like the role of a software architect. You're setting the direction, defining the constraints, making trade-offs, and stitching different parts together into a working system