3 ms·
The difference is that the choice to purchase devices that offer the freedom you want is available, if not the primary option. I don't wish to take that away fr
by _benton 1y ago
The difference is that the choice to purchase devices that offer the freedom you want is available, if not the primary option. I don't wish to take that away from you. However you are advocating for the only choice for a locked down device be legislated out of existence. There is a fundamental difference here!
- whstl 1y agoYou're right. I wish to take this away from you. To me this is completely fine, morally, philosophically and legally, and a lot of people seem to agree with me.
- robertlagrant 1y ago> a lot of people seem to agree with me Apple have over a billion iPhones out there I believe, and your phrasing of "it's all of us vs just you" is really inappropriate - both from an argumentation perspective and probably a fact perspective too.
- whstl 1y agoThis phrasing is not the good representation of what I mean at all. And the fact that people have iPhones doesn't invalidate my assertion, also it doesn't affect my right to an opinion.
- robertlagrant 1y ago> also it doesn't affect my right to an opinion No-one's saying you don't have a right to an opinion. Everyone has that right. It's bad faith to try and misrepresent what the person you're talking to is saying.
- whstl 1y agoI didn't say or imply that you suggested otherwise, I was merely making a statement. > No-one's saying you don't have a right to an opinion Someone said to me “Who are you to claim that my consumer desires are irrelevant?” so you’re wrong.
- wredcoll 1y ago> However you are advocating for the only choice for a locked down device be legislated out of existence Why would you make up something like this? What's the benefit to you?
- lenkite 1y agoFeel free to lock down your device. Stick to the Apple Store. You have that freedom. The rest of us want our freedom too.