3 ms·
I believe you're missing the GP's point. Just as some people are enraged by folks violating "no dogs" signs, there are people enraged by folks not following tr
by BeetleB 1y ago
I believe you're missing the GP's point.
Just as some people are enraged by folks violating "no dogs" signs, there are people enraged by folks not following traffic regulations (including the speed limit).
Just as someone may think it's weird that someone goes on a very, very angry rant about people driving 63 mph on a 60 mph zone, lots of people find it weird when people go on a rant about dogs.
This is exacerbated by the fact that one of these is much deadlier than the other.
So when you go on a rant about dogs, just keep in mind a lot of people are viewing you in a way people view those who complain about people going above the speed limit (regardless of the lane you're in).
Anti-disclaimer: I hate dogs. Would never date someone who had one because I don't want to be around one, and also because I wouldn't want to deprive someone of one.
- hollywood_court 1y agoI don’t think it’s fair to assume that people who are frustrated by others ignoring “no dog” policies somehow dislike dogs. That’s a false equivalence. I love dogs. I’ve had one by my side since the day I came home from the hospital as a newborn. These days, I often bring my dog with me to the office. But I’ve never once taken my dog somewhere dogs weren’t allowed. Respecting posted rules doesn’t mean you love dogs any less.
- BeetleB 1y ago> I don’t think it’s fair to assume that people who are frustrated by others ignoring “no dog” policies somehow dislike dogs. That’s a false equivalence. An equivalence I didn't make. Whether someone hates or likes dogs has no bearing on my point.