3 ms·
Hey, I was actually in this position at work a few years ago, when I set up a couple of internal (monitoring stuff) servers for my own use. I used Let's Encrypt
by eszed 1y ago
Hey, I was actually in this position at work a few years ago, when I set up a couple of internal (monitoring stuff) servers for my own use. I used Let's Encrypt, because I use them (for free) at home (media server), and know how it works.
I wanted to throw them some (of work's) cash, and... the only two options were "Sponsor", and "Donate". Sponsorship was, uh, wrong for my use-case: it starts at some multiple-thousands of dollars. Donating would be the obviously correct choice, but putting something marked "donation" onto a corporate card would occasion a... Weird conversation, in which "you could have got this for free, but you're choosing to send them money?" would likely have been raised. I went with free, and was sad about it.
Yes, corporate expectations and affordances around FOSS should change - and, I probably could have persuaded my employer that a few dollars a month for Let's Encrypt was the Right Thing To Do, so I'm a little bit of a coward - but LE would make it so much easier if there was a Send Us Money option that looks like a fee for service, rather than a donation. (Maybe being a 501c(3) precludes that? I don't know.)
There's the "Corporate doesn't understand FOSS" problem, but there's also a "FOSS doesn't speak Corporatese" obstacle there, too.
In the end I sent LE $20, or something, of my own money (I've had years of trouble-free use on my media server, and should have before), but they'd have had $5 / month of work's cash for years if they'd made that easier to do.
- pabs3 1y agoThere is a video here where FOSS donations confuses an accountant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTY-lQ3S1gw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTY-lQ3S1gw You could instead frame it as a payment for your dependency on the future existence of the FOSS you are using for free.
- szszrk 1y agoThey are (Internet Security Research Group) a non-profit, so maybe it would be hard to provide official services like you describe? I still can't find proper data on their financials, but at least below report (page 42) says only 10% of their revenue is donations. And 48% out of total spending is LE. https://www.isrg.org/documents/2024-ISRG-Annual-Report.pdf https://www.isrg.org/documents/2024-ISRG-Annual-Report.pdf
- Jarwain 1y agoIt may not even have to be an official service, just something that shows up on a CC statement as something other than a "donation". Or hey maybe they could charge for these expiration notifications.
- szszrk 1y agoI'm really not sure if that kind of organization can simply sell services like that. I'm guessing IRS doesn't care of that CC statement was official or not :)