I debated changing the title but as the commenters below mention the title is still accurate, as is the rest of the article. Meta was under no obligation to pay

I debated changing the title but as the commenters below mention the title is still accurate, as is the rest of the article. Meta was under no obligation to pay that much. Alexandr could have requested that Meta spend $14b on <charity of choice> and the title would still be correct. The only part of the article that I think needs some reworking is an implication in a footnote about how these kinds of deals screw over employees. They do, generally, but not in this case.