LOL, well I certainly can't see it in the future The future is not now, hence not entirely relevant, especially as there's a lot more future than the past. (hr

LOL, well I certainly can't see it in the future The future is not now, hence not entirely relevant, especially as there's a lot more future than the past. (hrm.. hopefully) unless I was very rudely typing this reply during an interview, it isn't happening now Yes, but "happening now" is an indicator of 1. How is that relevant for this aforementioned 12.5%? You'd need dozens of interviews to even begin to attain certainty. And bear in mind, this was referencing specifically gen z, which are all exceptionally young... just entering the workforce in fact. So unless all your dozens of sample cases are under 28, with most them being younger, it's apples to oranges. My point with all of this was, your initial post spoke of interviews of the past, which had no true bearing to "interviews now". After all, this very article says it's different than in the past! And to discredit the percentages discussed, you pointed at the whole 1 in 10 dentists thing, which has no relevance in discrediting this figure. It wasn't even 1 in 10, yes? More like 1 in 8, yes? And none of my response was rude. It was simply refuting what was data, which isn't really relevant here. I'd have even welcomed personal data, which said something akin to "I've interviewed 100 people under 28 in the last year, and none of this stuff is true!" But that's not what you've said. Instead, it seems you have a hunch. That's fair of course, but it was worded as a non-hunch.