3 ms·
25% more cores and 36% more clock. It amounts to paying 85% more for 70% more perf. Not too bad.
by Aissen 1y ago
25% more cores and 36% more clock. It amounts to paying 85% more for 70% more perf. Not too bad.
- burnt-resistor 1y agoGHz/MHz wars and ultra-deep pipelines lead to long pipeline stalls and low efficiency. Clock != (IPS) cycle efficiency. What matters is measured performance. There's little point in buying the most expensive option, it's usually throwing money away. Sometimes though, option are limited but there are also traditional and alternative channel vendors besides secondary markets. For example, a vendor or the mfgr might be willing to sample a part.
- Aissen 1y agoWhen comparing the same design, it absolutely makes sense, because it usually scales. Of course in this case, there's the SRAM which is shared, memory bandwidth, etc. As a rule of thumb: run your own benchmark!