4 ms·
I wonder why the title of the sequence isn't set to "Hofstadter's sequence" since that seems to be what it's called according to A030124 when it refers back to
by Aardwolf 1y ago
I wonder why the title of the sequence isn't set to "Hofstadter's sequence" since that seems to be what it's called according to A030124 when it refers back to this one
- andersource 1y agoHofstadter introduces several sequences in GEB, [0] may be an interesting submission on its own but I was especially captivated by this self-referencing one. Plus a title including both Hofstadter's sequence and a description is too long for HN and I preferred the descriptive one [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofstadter_sequence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofstadter_sequence
- Aardwolf 1y agoI meant the title as it appears in OEIS, not as it appears on HN :)
- andersource 1y agoAh :) From my (limited) experience the OEIS titles lean strongly to the descriptive side too. But maybe also to avoid ambiguity regarding to which one is it from his sequences?