> [0] don't reply to me about NaNs, please The question is why they added so many NaNs to the spec, instead of just one. Probably for a signal, but who actuall

> [0] don't reply to me about NaNs, please The question is why they added so many NaNs to the spec, instead of just one. Probably for a signal, but who actually uses that? For IEEE float16 the amount of lacking values due to an entire exponent value being needlessly taken up by NaNs is actually quite blatant.