3 ms·
> The article is saying it was DOGE Yah, but it's the guardian. They aren't exactly reliable. For it to be DOGE would require a time machine, because this pro
by ars 1y ago
> The article is saying it was DOGE
Yah, but it's the guardian. They aren't exactly reliable.
For it to be DOGE would require a time machine, because this project was shut down in 2015.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> but it's the guardian. They aren't exactly reliable This is valid and I'm open to someone calling out the reporting as non-factual with evidence. Pretending The Guardian is trying to imply this was DOGE when it straight out says as much, on the other hand, is closer to a reading-comprehension issue.