6 ms·
For everyone who's having a hard time parsing what Octelium does, I found this page to be the clearest explanation: https://octelium.com/docs/octelium/latest/ov
by ar-nelson 1y ago
For everyone who's having a hard time parsing what Octelium does, I found this page to be the clearest explanation: https://octelium.com/docs/octelium/latest/overview/how-octelium-works https://octelium.com/docs/octelium/latest/overview/how-octel...
It's clearer because, instead of starting with a massive list of everything you could do with Octelium (which is indeed confusing), it starts by explaining the core primitives Octelium is built on, and builds up from there.
And it actually looks pretty cool and useful! From what I can tell, the core funtionality is:
- A VPN-like gateway that understands higher-level protocols, like HTTP or PostgreSQL, and can make fine-grained security decisions using the content of those protocols
- A cluster configuration layer on top of Kubernetes
And these two things combine to make, basically, a personal cloud. So, like any of the big cloud platforms, it does a million things and it's hard to figure out which ones you need at first. But it seems like the kind of system that could be used for a homelab, a small company that wants to keep cloud costs down, or a custom PaaS selling cloud functionality. Neat!
- ttul 1y agoTailScale is wonderful but they do need competition. I imagine an IPO is on the horizon, and as soon as they enter that phase, nasty price increases are sure to follow unless someone else is nipping hard at their heels.
- seabrookmx 1y agoHopefully their tolerance to self-hosters (Headscale) doesn't change.
- wkat4242 1y agoThe problem is, commercial services will always enshittify. It's inevitable. Even when they conquer the whole market (see Netflix) they will want to see a rising line in profits so then they will turn the thumbscrews on the customers.
- candrewlee 1y agoIt’s especially when they conquer the whole market. It’s why investors favor growth and adoption, even at a loss, until it’s won the market and can turn up the monetization dial.
- wkat4242 1y agoWell, they do it anyway. All the streaming services are enshittifying, even the smaller ones. And other smaller webshops are enshittifying the same way that Amazon does. Like Cory Doctorow described, there's a few big webshops in the Netherlands like bol.com and coolblue.com and they are now also allowing third party sellers, often even from China. The webshops are absolved of all responsibility but they do cash out on every transaction.
- sakesun 1y agoThe term 'enshittification' sounds negative for what an organization needs to do to take care of employees.
- loloquwowndueo 1y agoSorry no. A stable organization with a good profit margin is enough to take care of employees and pay their salaries. Boundless growth which is what enshittification is associated with, is driven by money-hungry stakeholders and “investors” that demand an ever growing return on investment - they don’t settle for speed, they need constant acceleration.
- jacobn 1y agoIsn’t it more of an “all of the above”? A lot of employees at successful startups & FAANG make most of their money from the stock, no? And they need to buy houses and send their kids to fancy schools too, no? So sure, we can reduce it to stock holders, but I’d bet dollars to donuts the 90% of employees who aren’t posting on hn are at least passively ok with “improving metrics”, and some ambitious ones are driving the enshittification initiatives hard.
- wiesbadener 1y agoThey seem to be fine with it: "You could alternatively host your own trusted control server with Headscale."[1] [1] https://tailscale.com/blog/tailnet-lock-ga#self-hosting https://tailscale.com/blog/tailnet-lock-ga#self-hosting
- immibis 1y agoThey're fine with it now. They won't be, when the next potential revenue source on their list is to crack down on it. Remember, revenue must always increase, and must always increase faster than the year before (and this is more important than keeping the company alive), so companies always try increasingly desperate measures. Right now they are nowhere near the point of that particular measure. But they will be in the future.
- udev4096 1y agoThe individual working on headscale also works for tailscale. And being quite stable and prod ready, even if they pull the plug, a community fork would still keep it alive, given majority of essential features are already there
- PoachedEggs 1y agoI’ve been meaning to explore Netbird. Fewer features at the moment, but can be fully self hosted.
- FloatArtifact 1y agoTheir mobile android app is awful.
- braginini 1y agoWe have just published our android app rework for testing. Mind trying it out? Appreciate the feedback https://www.reddit.com/r/netbird/s/lRjyehCQFi https://www.reddit.com/r/netbird/s/lRjyehCQFi
- wkat4242 1y agoBut there are so so many competing products already? Not all are commercial (but why would you want that anyway). But ZeroTier is another one like that. Basically the same thing.
- cchance 1y agoI mean the fact headscale exists and is still in decent development, means i doubt it really is an issue, what i'd like to see is an effort for an opensource tailscale client so we could use headscale without the closed source client.
- maxboone 1y agoIsn't the client entirely OSS? - https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale
- zxexz 1y agoIIRC it’s just the macOS GUI client that’s closed source? I are the CLI client (CLIent?) compiled from source. EDIT: yep, referenced in your link! They have a very clear page[0] describing what is and isn’t open source. [0] https://tailscale.com/opensource https://tailscale.com/opensource
- dangoodmanUT 1y agoSee Nebula by slack
- braginini 1y agoThere is https://netbird.io https://netbird.io
- snapplebobapple 1y agoNetbird is nipping at their heels
- toomuchtodo 1y agoProgrammable network tunnel fabric.