2 ms·
It would do the opposite. It would set a minimum income that everyone would know they had. Whatever work people did would add to that. It would encourage the
by graemep 1y ago
It would do the opposite.
It would set a minimum income that everyone would know they had.
Whatever work people did would add to that. It would encourage the unemployed to start businesses, or do casual work as they would keep all the money (rather than having their benefits cut).