3 ms·
In some ways, the big success of AI agents is getting people to invest in and/or pay for "it's sometimes right" compared to previous expectations that if a syst
by Macha 1y ago
In some ways, the big success of AI agents is getting people to invest in and/or pay for "it's sometimes right" compared to previous expectations that if a system is incorrect that's a bug that needs fixing yesterday.
- cube00 1y agoIt's funny watching the grifters try to sell "but humans make mistakes too" However the reason I'm using a computer is because I want repeatable behaviour. If there's a bug, I want to fail every single time so I can fix it (yeah I know, buffer overruns and it's not always repeatable) but least I can squash the bug for good if I can actually find where I've stuffed up. Side note: Happening less with Rust now protecting me from myself which pleases me, at least the failures are more repeatable if I can get the inputs right. Where as now the "prompt engineers" try to fluff up the prompt with more CAPS and "CRITICAL" style wording to get it over the line today and they know full well it'll just break in some other weird way tomorrow. Hopefully a few more cases of LLMs going rouge will educate them since they refuse to learn from Air Canada or Cursor Support.