This is a cool concept, but for comparison, I can’t help but wish there was more comparison between the treatment group and a control group that doesn’t see any

This is a cool concept, but for comparison, I can’t help but wish there was more comparison between the treatment group and a control group that doesn’t see any universal pretraining data. It’s good to compare various model sizes and evaluation tasks and random data generators. I just think the paper would more effectively prove its point if it could show models of same sizes which see this random data can learn better from evaluation data later on. Could even take the initial checkpoint of the model before universal pretraining against the pretrained checkpoint. If the method works, the one that did UP will win. Maybe I’m way off, I’ll admit I only skimmed it so far. Seems promising, just wishing for some controls.