3 ms·
Most plausible reason. National security hawks have always been extremely protective of intelligence even when the risk is tiny. Probably some DoD people (or pe
by dmix 1y ago
Most plausible reason. National security hawks have always been extremely protective of intelligence even when the risk is tiny. Probably some DoD people (or person) wanted to keep it closed and new hawkish leadership let them do it.
Who knows, the Navy hasn't released any statement beyond "cyber security risks" so there's only politics to fill in the blanks.
It seems to be this agency https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleet_Numerical_Meteorology_and_Oceanography_Center https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleet_Numerical_Meteorology_an...
Who recently got a supercomputer system https://www.montereycountynow.com/news/local_news/a-new-supercomputer-in-monterey-boosts-the-navy-s-ability-to-predict-the-weather/article_80ca2b3e-6b08-11ef-94de-4f48b000eb07.html https://www.montereycountynow.com/news/local_news/a-new-supe...
- bix6 1y agoSo why does The King get to tweet pictures from our spy satellites then?
- justinrubek 1y agoIt's not even close to being a plausible reason when project 2025 states that this needs to happen.