3 ms·
> Regardless of how good a model gets I don't think this is true. My Claude Code can: - open a browser, debug a ui, or navigate to any website - write a scr
by ramoz 1y ago
> Regardless of how good a model gets
I don't think this is true.
My Claude Code can:
- open a browser, debug a ui, or navigate to any website
- write a script to interact with any type of accessible api
All without MCP.
Within a year I expect there to be legitimate "computer use" agents. I expect agent sdks to take over llm apis as defacto abstractions for models, and MCP will have limited use isolated to certain platforms - but with that caveat that an MCP-equipped agent performs worse than a native computer-use agent.
- anon7000 1y ago> open a browser, debug a ui, or navigate to any website I mean, that’s just saying the same thing — at the end of the day, there’s are underlying deterministic systems that it uses
- ramoz 1y agoYes my response was poorly oriented the parent comment
- codybontecou 1y agoThey are kind of the same thing... These are just tools Anthropic provides for you. Just like the tools a non-Anthropic service provides through their MCP server. A community-led effort of tool creation via MCP will surely be faster and more powerful than waiting for in-house implementations.