That 2nd example is a pretty bad example of JavaScript being used as a Oracle trademark. Id argue the opposite. The wording makes no reference to oracles owner

That 2nd example is a pretty bad example of JavaScript being used as a Oracle trademark. Id argue the opposite. The wording makes no reference to oracles ownership of the product or name that is JavaScript. And ECMA is reffered to as the "maker" of the standard. If anything, this is an example by Oracle themselves using the trademark in a generic context. Its like cocacola calling themselves "a producer of fanta" and referring to a the food and drug administration to define what that means. I doubt the writer of that doc was aware that Oracle owns the JavaScript trademark.