> One of the principles behind MCP is that "an MCP server should be very easy to implement". I’m not familiar with the details but I would imagine that it’s mo

> One of the principles behind MCP is that "an MCP server should be very easy to implement". I’m not familiar with the details but I would imagine that it’s more like: ”An MCP server which re-exposes an existing public/semi-public API should be easy to implement, with as few changes as possible to the original endpoint” At least that’s the only way I can imagine getting traction.