4 ms·
The difference is that e.g. Māori or native Americans and whatnot are full citizens with full rights. The "founded on ethnic cleansing" is not the most importa
by arp242 1y ago
The difference is that e.g. Māori or native Americans and whatnot are full citizens with full rights.
The "founded on ethnic cleansing" is not the most important bit from the previous post. It's the "ethnic cleansing and denial of rights has continued ever since" that's the most important bit.
- breppp 1y agoNo, the difference is that the native population of western countries very much disappeared, because this was an actual genocide their percent of population is now negligible. While the Palestinian population in Israel proper is around 25% with full rights, while those under the control of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas have rights in their respective political entity. Again there are other examples of countries where the population lost all rights and were expelled like germans in czechoslovakia and poland or greeks from turkey
- arp242 1y ago> the native population of western countries very much disappeared That's simply not true. It's very obviously not true. Are you denying that Māoris and Native Americans exist today? I cannot phantom why you would say such obvious nonsense. I no longer believe you are engaging in good faith. Good day.
- flkenosad 1y agoThere's a bunch of native tribes that got completely wiped out. What are you talking about?
- breppp 1y agoI said "negligible". The original population was largely killed and replaced
- arp242 1y agoMāori is something like a fifth of the population of New Zealand. You have no idea what you're talking about and have starting to spread falsehoods of Trumpian proportions. Maybe the Māori are eating the cats and dogs too?