3 ms·
Except the US views it as its right to assemble who it wants to allow in. Same right, different perspective.
by mensetmanusman 1y ago
Except the US views it as its right to assemble who it wants to allow in. Same right, different perspective.
- happymellon 1y agoHow so? It doesnt even seem remotely the same. That would be the right to prevent assembly.
- mensetmanusman 1y agoA team assembling on the playground that doesn’t pick all the friends who want to play together has prevented the friends from assembling. Assembly amongst all groups simultaneously isn’t possible with humans who are not bifurcating bosons.
- happymellon 1y agoThat doesn't make sense. Just because you used a word in a sentence doesn't make it so. > A team assembling on the playground that doesn’t pick all the friends who want to play together has prevented the friends from assembling. They haven't prevented anything. Just because a team assembled, does not exclude others from being there. They can exclude, of course, but that has nothing to do with the assembly. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/assembly https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/assembl... > uncountable noun > When you refer to rights of assembly or restrictions on assembly, you are referring to the legal right that people have to gather together It's the gathering thats the assembly, not the exclusion. You just made that up.
- pastage 1y agoThis is not remotely true. Of course it is denied if you can classify it as violent.
- mindslight 1y agoNo, "the US" does not. Maybe the fascists currently in power are twisting words like that though, just as they twist every other lofty ideal into a rationalization for hurting people.