5 ms·
Saying these guys "took on Facebook" is a bit of a stretch. Did they even make available a beta version? I don't think so. Talking about taking on Facebook is
by LargeWu 14y ago
Saying these guys "took on Facebook" is a bit of a stretch. Did they even make available a beta version? I don't think so. Talking about taking on Facebook is very much different than actually doing it. I think they are getting a lot more credit than they actually deserve.
- uptown 14y ago"Did they even make available a beta version? I don't think so." http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/diaspora-open-facebook-alternative-releases-code/ http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/diaspora-open-faceb...
- shinratdr 14y agoRequiring users to have the resources, time and technical expertise to set up the server themselves is hardly making a beta version available. Most "beta" web services are still hosted.
- dredmorbius 14y agoIt's also not how Diaspora works. Setting up a server is possible but not required. Get your facts straight much?
- shinratdr 14y agoSorry, where did they host the Beta?
- Argorak 14y agojoindiaspora.com
- thinkingisfun 14y agoThere are so many public pods, and have been for years. Are you pretending you actually at some point tried to sign up and check it out? Really?
- LargeWu 14y agoThat article is from 2 years ago, and what from what I understand, it was a barely-functioning prototype. As recently as March of this year, they updated their roadmap. The second heading is "The Road to Beta". It also includes the line, "After these features are tackled, we feel that Diaspora as a platform will be Beta". It's pretty clear the founders themselves never even considered it to be a beta product. See: https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/wiki/Roadmap https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/wiki/Roadmap
- rd108 14y agoWhat? I USE diaspora. it's awesome.. I actually prefer it to Facebook because there's less noise (my interests are not the same as the 400 friends I made while living in college dorms.)