3 ms·
The things they did wrong were: - During the initial 6-12 months after the Kickstarter there was little or no communication about what they were doing. Blog p
by motters 14y ago
The things they did wrong were:
- During the initial 6-12 months after the Kickstarter there was little or no communication about what they were doing. Blog posts were very scarce. If you want to maintain interest in a project it's a good idea to have some level of communications.
- They made initial software choices which meant that the initial release wouldn't run on the target platform (ARM based servers)
- Once Diaspora got going it wasn't easy to find pods other than joindiaspora
- The Diaspora team were unresponsive to patch submissions and this meant that features which users wanted didn't get implemented.
- There were issues with the protocol being undocumented
- jeremyjh 14y ago>The Diaspora team were unresponsive to patch submissions and this meant that features which users wanted didn't get implemented. So you've read pistos blog. Have you look at the contributions though? https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/graphs/contributors https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/graphs/contributors No open source project accepts every pull request, but Diaspora has accepted quite a lot.