> The system simply cannot work if any district judge anywhere can veto the president's policies. Except that it's been working just fine that way since before

> The system simply cannot work if any district judge anywhere can veto the president's policies. Except that it's been working just fine that way since before I was born, so, empirically, you're wrong. > the president was going to be forced to start ignoring injunctions [...] The Roberts court had to make this ruling for the government to function. So basically you're saying their way to legitimize Trump ignoring court orders is to de-legitimize an entire type of court order that has been commonplace and accepted for 50 years. This sounds like "we'll change the law so Trump doesn't have to break it". Authoritarianism it is, then, I guess.