This makes the language more uniform. Instead of having a special ternary ?: operator for if-else in expression position, you have one syntax everywhere. It ma

This makes the language more uniform. Instead of having a special ternary ?: operator for if-else in expression position, you have one syntax everywhere. It makes generic code work without need to add exceptions for "syntactic elements". You can have methods like `map(callback)` that take a generic `fn() -> T` and pass through `T`. This can work uniformly for functions that do return values as well as for functions that just have `return;`. Having nothingness as a real type makes it just work using one set of rules for types, rather than having rules for real types plus exceptions for "syntactic elements".